Comments on: Prutton to sign after all? http://nffcblog.com/2007/01/29/prutton-to-sign-after-all/ The mindless ramblings of a Forest fan half imbued with a probably misguided sense of optimism.. Mon, 13 Feb 2012 00:14:41 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Forest Forest http://nffcblog.com/2007/01/29/prutton-to-sign-after-all/#comment-2786 Tue, 30 Jan 2007 14:31:36 +0000 http://nffcblog.com/2007/01/29/prutton-to-sign-after-all/#comment-2786 Pete: maybe so, but Prutton’s a good Championship level player, and he’s also got experience of playing above that level, which we could do with for the younger players. Now, if we could find another Roy Keane, that would be great…

]]> By: Pete http://nffcblog.com/2007/01/29/prutton-to-sign-after-all/#comment-2780 Tue, 30 Jan 2007 09:31:32 +0000 http://nffcblog.com/2007/01/29/prutton-to-sign-after-all/#comment-2780 WE NEED PLAYERS ON THEIR WAY UP, NOT ON THEIR WAY DOWN

]]> By: Forest Forest http://nffcblog.com/2007/01/29/prutton-to-sign-after-all/#comment-2766 Mon, 29 Jan 2007 23:00:41 +0000 http://nffcblog.com/2007/01/29/prutton-to-sign-after-all/#comment-2766 The BBC has it that Prutts is in talks with us – so it must be true, eh? We could do a lot worse, couldn’t we? If he can harness his temper and use it to fuel his craetivity then that’s great. I hope he’s prepared for a wage cut, though…

Also, Stan the Man’s looking for a club now, isn’t he? Jack Lester might need a new drinking partner soon.

Bet you we sign someone from north of the border…

]]> By: Wacko Jacko http://nffcblog.com/2007/01/29/prutton-to-sign-after-all/#comment-2752 Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:45:45 +0000 http://nffcblog.com/2007/01/29/prutton-to-sign-after-all/#comment-2752 I have heard from Prutton’s mate that he’s joining, but the same source said he was in talks with Watford before and dcided to sit and wait for a Bosman. I hope its confirmed as true soon – he would be an excellent addition and a future captain.

]]> By: Baz http://nffcblog.com/2007/01/29/prutton-to-sign-after-all/#comment-2747 Mon, 29 Jan 2007 15:39:14 +0000 http://nffcblog.com/2007/01/29/prutton-to-sign-after-all/#comment-2747 Gary Holt or David Prutton? you decide …

]]> By: NikoJaan http://nffcblog.com/2007/01/29/prutton-to-sign-after-all/#comment-2746 Mon, 29 Jan 2007 14:59:14 +0000 http://nffcblog.com/2007/01/29/prutton-to-sign-after-all/#comment-2746 I think Prutton would be a good signing just the player we need. Someone driving the midfield a bit. Wouldn’t mnd a young right winger aswell! Lets hope by wednesday some of these rumours are true

]]> By: WorksopRed http://nffcblog.com/2007/01/29/prutton-to-sign-after-all/#comment-2744 Mon, 29 Jan 2007 14:02:51 +0000 http://nffcblog.com/2007/01/29/prutton-to-sign-after-all/#comment-2744 Just to add more transfer rumours, I heard on Friday from a friend of a friend of a Premiership scout (very tenuous, I know) that we are about to sign Prutton and Stephen Clemence from Birmingham on loan til end of season. Probably a load of nonsense but I thought I’d mention it anyway

]]> By: EgorTheRed http://nffcblog.com/2007/01/29/prutton-to-sign-after-all/#comment-2743 Mon, 29 Jan 2007 13:36:06 +0000 http://nffcblog.com/2007/01/29/prutton-to-sign-after-all/#comment-2743 I’m sure things are gonna move now.

Call me a cynic but I thought Smolders would wait with his annoucements until after the Chelsea game – as like me, he thought the club could do with a well timed lift…..

Fingers crossed…….

]]> By: Kieran http://nffcblog.com/2007/01/29/prutton-to-sign-after-all/#comment-2742 Mon, 29 Jan 2007 13:28:20 +0000 http://nffcblog.com/2007/01/29/prutton-to-sign-after-all/#comment-2742 “Unamed Southampton player” – Gareth Bale??? ;-)

]]> By: tom smith http://nffcblog.com/2007/01/29/prutton-to-sign-after-all/#comment-2741 Mon, 29 Jan 2007 13:06:02 +0000 http://nffcblog.com/2007/01/29/prutton-to-sign-after-all/#comment-2741 i hope prutton story is true as yates, also rumours today that chambers will sign by deadline day, hope its all true but if were after yates and chambers, that tells me commons and cullip are both leaving

]]>